Oh, and one last thing. A program is being started in Mass where physicians will be reimbursed for e-mailing patients, in an attempt to improve communication. (IGNORE THIS SCREED - RE-READ IT AND IT READS LIKE AN IDIOT'S RAMBLINGS. I BLAME, NOT MYSELF NATURALLY, BUT PATRIARCHY, CAFFEINE AND JUNK FOOD. EVIL JUNK FOOD) While I know this is a good idea in theory, I can't help wondering if this will turn out to be like capitation, which everyone thought was such a good idea when it was first proposed, and then turned out to be a complete and utter horror. Hope not. We'll see, I guess.
UPDATE: In an attempt at being flip, I was too dismissive of the potential of e-mail to improve patient-doctor communication. I do think it will prove to be useful. Read enoch choi's comment below: he has had good experience with using e-mail in his practice. Thanks for the info!
ok, on one hand some docs will abuse something they can get paid for (e.g. some will push people to decrease their use of phonecalls which they don't get paid for, and instead do online consults which they can get $). On the other hand, many people find that it's easier to consult online, more efficient, and clearly documented in their record what they wanted. We've had a great success in our group with online consults, and we don't get paid for them in CA. It's just more efficient and better quality care.
Posted by: enoch choi | May 26, 2004 at 09:11 PM
enoch, I think you are right. I have a tendency to be too cynical but I do think that it will improve overall efficiency. I was thinking of pathology where e-mailing docs is one more step in the chain of things we do, rather than an alternative to sending a hard copy. Which is good, we just don't get reimbursed for it, so it 'eats' up time that could be used in other ways.
Overall, you are right I think. It is better for the patient which is the most important thing. I was being too flip. Thanks for calling me on it :)
Posted by: MD | May 27, 2004 at 09:26 AM
I can't find much online about this new program; all that I see is an old issue of Hippocrates:
http://www.hippocrates.com/archive/November2000/11features/11feat_email.html
do you have news links?
Posted by: Nick | May 27, 2004 at 06:43 PM
Nick, try these posts of mine (the 4th & 5th are probably of most interest to you):
http://www.enochchoi.com/thoughts/archives/000046.html
http://www.enochchoi.com/thoughts/archives/000051.html
http://www.enochchoi.com/thoughts/archives/000052.html
http://www.enochchoi.com/thoughts/archives/000053.html
http://www.enochchoi.com/thoughts/archives/000079.html
or check out Craig's last post about this:
http://www.drbradley.com/blog/2004/05/do_patients_wan.html
Posted by: enoch choi | May 28, 2004 at 04:05 AM
Nick, it's from a boston globe article from a couple days ago - found it on the boston.com website.
enoch - thanks for the links. Really interested in reading them when I get a chance!
Posted by: MD | May 28, 2004 at 06:44 PM
Thanks, people!
Posted by: Nick | June 02, 2004 at 08:18 PM
i need a telephone number for dr.bradley here in nacogdoches,texas. his office #, ok.
Posted by: sarah smelley | July 02, 2004 at 02:22 PM
Hello, your blog is really fantastic. There are a real community for real men. My regards to posters.
Posted by: Christine Jenkins | January 26, 2005 at 02:44 PM